2012;114(2):50019. Median values and the graphed interval (minimum and maximum values), are indicated. Our systems have detected unusual traffic from your computer network. We found a small but significant association between journal tier and review type (p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.054, df=2). Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z, https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/initial-submission, https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001820, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01102.x, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. We can conclude that authors from the least prestigious institutions are more likely to choose DBPR compared to authors from the most prestigious institutions and authors from the mid-range institutions. If authors choose DBPR, their details (names and affiliations) are removed from the manuscript files, and it is the authors responsibility to ensure their own anonymity throughout the text and beyond (e.g. . We employed a Wald test to evaluate the statistical significance of each coefficient in the model by testing the hypothesis that the coefficient of an independent variable in the model is significantly different from zero. 2000;90(4):71541. Nature does not consider Communications Arising on papers published in other journals. Each journal is able to customize the wording of the status terms, but the same status phases apply to all journals using Editorial Manager. A study of the distribution of gender among reviewers and editors of the Frontiers journals showed an underrepresentation of women in the process, as well as a same-gender preference (homophily) [10]. 0000006171 00000 n If that article is rejected, the journal name and public peer review timeline will be removed but the preprint and any versions of it, if any, will remain public. Are you sure you do not want to provide feedback? Methods Data includes 128,454 manuscripts . Nature Communications is incorporating transparent peer review into the journal on a permanent basis, following a successful ten-month trial. 1991;81(5):104167. Submission to first editorial decision - 8, Submission to first post-review decision - 46. In addition, the high prestige of these journals might accentuate an implicit referee bias and therefore makes such journals a good starting point for such an analysis. Times Higher Education - World University Rankings. Share your preprint and track your manuscript's review progress with our In Review service. When action from your side is required, this will also be announced by email. Check Status". We found that manuscripts submitted under DBPR are less likely to be sent to review and accepted than those submitted under SBPR. 0000013595 00000 n We had gender information for 50,533 corresponding authors and found no statistically significant difference in the distribution of peer review model between males and females (p value=0.6179). Here, we define the corresponding author as the author who is responsible for managing the submission process on the manuscript tracking system and for all correspondence with the editorial office prior to publication. All papers submitted from January 2016 qualify for this scheme. Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review. Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. While the metrics presented here are not intended to be a definitive list, we hope that they will prove to be informative. The outcome both at first decision and post review is significantly more negative (i.e. 0000008659 00000 n Nature Portfolio is a signatory of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (see here for more information about our endorsement). As mentioned in the Methods section, we have used a commercial algorithm to attribute gender based on first names, and discarded records that could not be matched with accuracy greater than 80%. Journal-integrated preprint sharing fromSpringer Nature and Research Square, Share your preprint and trackyour manuscripts review progress with ourIn Review service. Linkping University. The motivation behind Nature Communications is to provide authors with more choice; both in terms of where they publish, and what access model they want for their papers.At present NPG does not provide a rapid publishing opportunity for authors with high-quality specialist work within the Nature branded titles. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z. palabras en latn con significados bonitos. HUM6WEX:hQR{pe"3>g7`,. "Editor decision started" means that the editor is actively reading the manuscript. Tomkins A, Zhang M, Heavlin WD. 0000002034 00000 n Nature-branded journals publishing primary research introduced DBPR as an optional service in March 2015 in response to authors requests [17]. The result was a p value below 0.05, which shows that removing any of the predictors would harm the fit of the best model. This is because authors cannot modify their choice of review model at the transfer stage, and thus transfers cannot contribute to the uptake analysis. Nature Support Solution home Author and Peer Reviewer Support Submission Rejection of your paper / manuscript Modified on: Mon, 26 Jul, 2021 at 6:04 PM Springer is committed to your. national association of state directors of developmental disabilities service, how many years did juan carlos serve as king. What happens after my manuscript is accepted? Table1 displays the number and proportion of transfers by journal group. How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and We employed descriptive statistics for data exploration, and we tested our hypotheses using Pearsons chi-square and binomial tests. In any 6-month period, manuscripts can be under editorial assessment . Accepted articles are automatically sent to the production department once the Editor has made a final decision of 'Accept'. 0000065294 00000 n The author can request that the deadline be extended by writing to the editor in advance. (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Immediacy Index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. Hb```f``5g`c`} 6Pc. . The status of the manuscript says 'Reviewers Assigned' for about 24 days. Papers. Please let me know of your decision at your earliest . The "satiscing," process-oriented view is based primarily on Simon's (1979) work on. . We did not observe gender-related differences in uptake. Thus, we cannot draw conclusions on any editor bias. We note here that, in recent years, trends in scholarly publishing have emerged that strongly propose transparent, or open, peer review as a model that could potentially improve the quality and robustness of the peer review process [18]. Similar to the uptake case, the models do not have a good fit to the data. 7u?p#T3;JUQJBw|u 2v{}ru76SRA? sciencenature - 0000039536 00000 n 0000004476 00000 n Does double-blind review benefit female authors? We then studied the manuscripts editorial outcome in relation to review model and authors characteristics. nature physics. 2017;12(12):e0189311. Your new or revised submission has been sent back by the Editorial Team for changes prior to review. The corresponding author takes responsibility for the manuscript during the submission, peer review and production process. We found that a smaller proportion of DBPR papers are sent to review compared with SBPR papers and that there is a very small but significant association between review type and outcome of the first editorial decision (results of a chi-square test: 2=1623.3, df=1, p value <0.001; Cramers V=0.112). Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Malay S, Zhong L, Weinstein A, Rohrich RJ. Thus, our unit of analysis is identified by three elements: the manuscript, the corresponding author, and the journal. (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Article Influence Score determines the average influence of a journal's articles over the first five years after publication. We did not find a significant association between OTR and gender (Pearsons chi-square test results: 2=0.015641, df=1, p value=0.9005). Peer Review | Nature Portfolio BMcG was the major contributor in writing the Background and Methods sections. 2022.6.13 Editor Decision Started. 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. Please log in to your personal My Springer Nature profile and click on "Your submissions" to start tracking your articles. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Is my manuscript likely to be peer reviewed by now? - Editage Insights When comparing acceptance rates by gender and regardless of review model, we observed that female authors are significantly less likely to be accepted than their male counterparts. We used a significance threshold of 0.05. Help Us Celebrate Legal Talent. The corresponding author does not need to be the first author . In our case, the option that the outcome is subject to a complex combination of soft constraints or incentives is possible, which supports our simpler approach of evaluating the variables with the bivariate approach we have reported on. Regarding gender bias, a study showed that blinding interviewees in orchestra interviews led to more females being hired [8]. Accessed 15 Jan 2017. 0000007398 00000 n It was on December 21, 1968, that Apollo 8 launched from Cape Kennedy, in Florida, sending US astronauts Frank Borman, James Lovell Jr and William Anders on the world's . In order to see whether author uptake could be accurately predicted based on author and journal characteristics, we attempted to fit logistic regression models to the data. We would like to thank Michelle Samarasinghe for the help in collecting the data from the manuscript tracking system and Sowmya Swaminathan for the comments on the study and feedback on the manuscript draft. This measure is roughly analogous to the 5-Year Journal Impact Factor in that it is a ratio of a journal's citation influence to the size of the journal's article contribution over a period of five years. China and the USA stand out for their strong preference for DBPR and SBPR, respectively. Terms and Conditions, PLOS ONE. This is known as a rescinding. Corresponding author defined. (Nature Portfolio Data), Nature Communications (Nat Commun) This is public, and permanent. Get Scientific Editing. Modified on: Thu, 30 Jul, 2020 at 4:54 PM. The decision involved a ruling on a motion to . You should have received an email detailing the changes needed to your submission. For this analysis, we included direct submissions as well as transferred manuscripts, because the editorial criteria vary by journal and a manuscript rejected by one journal and transferred to another may then be sent out to review. For translations into other languages, we recommend using YouTube's translation feature. 0000012316 00000 n Because the median is not subject to the . reparationstapet kllare . The WeWork Decision. Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Data are collected annually for full calendar years. Timely attention to proofs will ensure the article is slated for the next possible issue. The editorial and peer review processwill continue through the peer review systemsas usual. . We decided to exclude the NA entries for gender and tested the null hypothesis that the two populations (manuscripts by male corresponding authors and manuscripts by female corresponding authors) have the same OTR rate within each of the two review models. 2007;18(2):MR000016. We would like to have the manuscript considered for publication in Pathobiology. So, in October 2018, we added a new . If you have no email from the journal and have already checked the spam folder of your mailbox, you may check if the submission . To ascertain whether indeed any referee bias is present, we studied the acceptance rate by gender and review type. In the ten countries with the highest number of submissions, we found a large significant association between country and review type (p value <0.001, df=10, Cramers V=0.189). For example, a report showed that 34% of 880 manuscripts submitted to two radiology journals contained information that would either potentially or definitely reveal the identities of the authors or their institution [2]. journals - All Reviewers Assigned : Nature Communications revised If you choose to opt in, your article will undergo some basic quality controlchecks before being sent to theIn Reviewplatform. Table14 shows acceptance rate by institution group, regardless of review type. Papers. Although each journal published by Cell Press is editorially independent, we have been using Editorial Manager, a manuscript tracking system that allows authors to transfer manuscripts along with any review comments they may have between Molecular Plant and Plant Communications.Should you have any questions about the . "More Manuscript Info and Tools. 0000012294 00000 n Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies. Similar to the uptake case, the models do not have a good fit to the data. This work was supported by The Alan Turing Institute under the EPSRC grant EP/N510129/1. Nature 2008;23(7):3513. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Moreover, some records were not complete if authors made spelling mistakes when entering the names of their country or institution, as this would have made it impossible to match those names with normalised names for countries or for institutions using GRID. We excluded data where the gender was not assigned to either male or female. Don't wait too long. The decision post-review of whether to accept a paper or not is taken by the editor but is based on the feedback received from the referees, so we assume that the decision at this stage would reflect a potential referee bias. Based on the Nature Communications Review Speed Feedback System, it takes authors 11.6 days to get the first editorial decision. Table2 displays the uptake by journal group and shows that the review model distribution changes as a function of the journal tier, with the proportion of double-blind papers decreasing for tiers with comparatively higher perceived prestige. Similar results are achieved if simpler logistic regression models are considered, such as review type modelled on journal tier and institution and review type modelled on journal tier only. We investigated the uptake of double-blind review in relation to journal tier, as well as gender, country, and institutional prestige of the corresponding author. Manuscript Submission Guidelines: Natural Product Communications: SAGE In the out-to-review analysis, we observed a significant difference between the OTR rate of papers by male and female corresponding authors of DBPR papers. "This is an extension of the wisdom-of-crowds theory that allows us to relax the assumption that being in big groups is always the best way to make a . . By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? Authors must then complete the submission process at the receiving journal. 0000014828 00000 n This resulted in 17,379 (14%) instances of manuscripts whose corresponding author was female, 83,830 (65%) manuscripts with male corresponding author, and 27,245 (21%) manuscripts with gender NA. isolera golv plintgrund This agreement provides: A supported path for UC authors to publish open access in Springer's subscription-based and open access journals, including Springer, Springer Open, BioMed . (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Eigenfactor Score calculation is based on the number of times articles from the journal published in the past five years have been cited in the JCR year, but it also considers which journals have contributed these citations so that highly cited journals will influence the network more than lesser cited journals. In order to see whether the OTR outcome could be accurately predicted based on author and journal characteristics, we attempted to fit logistic regression models to the data. Online First - Article available online 6. our vision is for all Springer Nature authors and reviewers to have an ORCID iD, and we are confident we will get there, slowly but surely. Yes 2017;114(48):1270813. Similar results were reported for the journal Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery [5]. nature~. 0000001795 00000 n 0000002625 00000 n The dataset consisted of 133,465 unique records, with 63,552 different corresponding authors and 209,057 different institution names. Vintage Cardboard Christmas Decorations, We also attempted to fit a generalized linear mixed effects model with a random effect for the country category, as we can assume that the data is sampled by country and observations from the same country share characteristics and are not independent. Did you find it helpful? ,.,., . However, we did not find a combination of predictors that led to a model with a good fit to the data. This is because online submission has completely abolished the uncertainty of postal speed, an obstacle faced when manually submitting a manuscript. Sodexo Disney Springs, 2015;136(6):136977. 2002;179(6):14157. Each review is due in ten days, and many of them do arrive in two weeks.
Renting A House With Foundation Problems,
Can You Take Cetirizine And Fexofenadine Together,
Peanut Butter Egg Rolls Chicago,
Examples Of Hegemony In Pop Culture,
Articles D